Testing and Data
RoofRestor™ Shingle Rejuvenator - Screening Evaluation (2018)
Study Focus: Initial testing on aged organic felt-based shingles to assess flexibility, granule adhesion, hail impact resistance, and fire resistance.
Key Results:
Granule Adhesion: Improved by 86%, significantly reducing wear.
Hail Impact Resistance: 6.6% improvement, with more potential on fiberglass-mat shingles.
Fire Resistance: Flame spread reduced from 144 in² to 86 in².
RoofRestor™ vs. Leading Competitor - Benchmark Study (2022)
Study Focus: Comparison between RoofRestor™™ and a leading rejuvenator on 14-year-old asphalt shingles over 10 years of simulated weathering.
Key Results:
Mass Loss: RoofRestor™ 3.8x better than the competitor, preserving shingle integrity.
Granule Loss: 2.5x lower than the competitor, reducing wear.
Oxidation Resistance: RoofRestor™ slowed asphalt aging by 5.2x.
RoofRestor™ Benchmark Life-Cycle Study - Part 2 (2024)
Study Focus: A second comparison of RoofRestor™™ vs. a competitor under accelerated aging equivalent to 10 years of real-world exposure.
Key Results:
Mass Loss: RoofRestor™ 3.8x better than the competitor.
Granule Loss: 2.5x lower than the competitor.
Oxidation Resistance: RoofRestor™ slowed asphalt aging by 5.2x.
RoofRestor™ Benchmark Life-Cycle Study - Part 3 (2024)
Study Focus: Evaluating RoofRestor™ vs. a competitor on 14-year-old shingles with accelerated testing simulating 10 years of weathering.
Key Results:
Mass Loss: 9.1x better than untreated shingles and 3.8x better than the competitor.
Granule Retention: 5.8x better than untreated shingles, preserving surface integrity.
Oxidation Resistance: Slowed aging by 8.1x.
RoofRestor™ Full Benchmark Life-Cycle Study (2024)
Study Focus: A comprehensive 10-year simulated weathering test comparing RoofRestor™ to untreated and competitor-treated shingles.
Key Results:
Mass Loss: 9.1x better than untreated and 3.8x better than competitor-treated shingles.
Granule Retention: 5.8x lower loss than untreated shingles.
Oxidation Resistance: RoofRestor™ slowed asphalt aging by 8.1x.
RoofRestor™ vs. Untreated Shingles - Benchmark Study (2024)
Study Focus: Direct head-to-head comparison between RoofRestor™-treated and untreated shingles.
Key Results:
Mass Loss: RoofRestor™ 9.1x better than untreated shingles.
Granule Retention: 5.8x better than untreated, maintaining shingle integrity.
Oxidation Resistance: Slowed asphalt aging by 8.1x, preventing brittleness
RoofRestor™ Safety Data Sheet
Indicates Roofrestor™ as an irritant in it’s concentrated form.
Get In Touch
